I agree that not all people mistaken in users are interested defenders of scamers. Everyone makes mistakes, but I'm sure that some users intentionally protect caught fraudsters for one reason or another.
As for my alleged lie: since yesterday, a lot of posts were written in the locale ... do you read them? Do you think they all adequately describe objective reality or do some users lie?
It's a discussion with all kinds of opinions, as discussions tend to be. To call it some sort of "protection" conspiracy is asinine.As for my alleged lie: since yesterday, a lot of posts were written in the locale ... do you read them? Do you think they all adequately describe objective reality or do some users lie?
This is your opinion, I have a different opinion and anyone who reads a topic from the very beginning can make up their own opinion.
Some people probably lie. You definitely lie.
How nice to hear the decision of the last resort. Thank you for your opinion.
Again, you can do whatever you want and I'm sure you will. It's your own credibility at risk when you're mixing credible accusations with not-so-credible insinuations and revisionism.
Just for this (unmixing), there are discussions "with all kinds of opinions, as discussions tend to be" so yes i will continue to do that i'm doing
At the moment, I am pleased with the results - despite the difficulties, many scamers are tagged and banned.