i stated they were not incentivized to make an attack if they could even get in that position.
The most obvious one would be to take out your competition which is a pretty big incentive and is the sort of thing that happens all the time when control/power comes into play for those that seek it.
And it sounds to me like your just trying to create Fud.
Why is it when people don't like what someone is saying, they automatically turn to claiming it's "FUD". You simply made a statement that I found fault with and was pointing that out. Nothing more.
FYI BitcoinEXpress already tried this FUD attack and was unable to follow through with his botnet. I would be more worried of your SV getting 51'd.
Did he? Well he's also the guy that said he would attack Monero and then didn't right? So...... Yeah...
What do you mean "my SV"? You think I support that cause I've posted in there? I think my more recent comment in there sort of shows I don't.
I'd be worried about "all" coins. Bitcoin Cash was attacked and they did a 51% double spend on it rewriting the ledger that isn't supposed to be rewritten. Course they "justified" it.. Didn't ETH do the same thing? And there was another coin that had the same sort of thing didn't they? vertcoin or via or something? These things have already happened and so someone just has to have a good enough reason and they can do it to any coin.
But sure. If you can't argue the issues then say FUD. Sort of says it all right there.