Re: List of banned participants in the Cryptotalk Campaign
~
Sir, I hope you read the topic to the end, because today all the charges have been dropped as unfounded. I do not ask you to believe me, but it turned out that I never violated the rules of the bounty campaigns, which was confirmed by the check of LoyceV. I hope you did not put me on your blacklist because your campaigns are one of the best and I would be happy to work again under your managementin the future.
I think your advice is wise. Thank.
Sir, I hope you read the topic to the end, because today all the charges have been dropped as unfounded. I do not ask you to believe me, but it turned out that I never violated the rules of the bounty campaigns, which was confirmed by the check of LoyceV. I hope you did not put me on your blacklist because your campaigns are one of the best and I would be happy to work again under your managementin the future.
I think your advice is wise. Thank.
Please do not lie. The investigation is still ongoing.
And it turns out that your family is growing in size. Friends have already appeared:
@LoyceV
First of all, I would like to show you what you missed in the comments:
be.open answer:
I cant know how many people are behind these five accounts, but the fact is that they are all connected and engaged in shady / fraudulent activities.
These are not isolated errors. This is a systematic violation of forum rules and deception of other users.
Obviously be.open/Sancho18 have violated this rule.
Perhaps the bounty manager and the company that holds the bounty are not against it, but the rules are written clearly. The fact is that they were violated.
Father and son communicate on the forum and send merit for good messages to each other? The very idea of this seems very strange to me.
From what I've seen, the large majority of all bounty spammers uses fake Twitter accounts that only have other bounty spammers as followers.
You are right, but all thieves steal the same way. And there are a lot of them. And this is not a reason not to punish caught thieves.
When you have a "son" who generously sends you merits, and when you have a "friend" with a whole farm of accounts, then of course it is easier to get merits than honestly having one account.
Please read the post I quoted at the beginning of the post. It's not just "little sins."
A user with a red tag can bring benefit to this forum just like a user without a red tag. And it seems to me when we forgive some obvious violator, we do much more harm to the forum than good, as ordinary participants feel that there is no objectivity, but there is a hierarchical system. All users are equal, but some users are more equal than others. (c)
First of all, I would like to show you what you missed in the comments:
~ And my only mistake by inattention does not mean that I am a cheater.
There is such a funny user Prod.
He became a member in just a week, very successfully received 10 merits from be.open (1), Sancho18 (5), Kutkh (1) and Bonanzabits (3). And on the same day he became a member he sent 4 merits to be.open.
Bonanzabits
Look at the pages Prod, Kutkh and Bonanzabits and see, that they are decorated in one style on 100%:
http://archive.md/4f6qm http://archive.md/jT1AL http://archive.md/rcEFC
Besides
Prod:
Date Registered: November 26, 2017, 03:11:43 PM
Last Active: November 07, 2018, 05:34:14 PM
Kutkh:
Date Registered: November 26, 2017, 04:09:31 PM
Last Active: November 07, 2018, 05:36:15 PM
The pages contain ETH addresses. And its clear that Bonanzabits from his address 0xBE96A5d1aD23142e7Ed0b25fe28C4478B7318170 sent ETH to Kutkh 0xEB82E662bAfdab04A6190E8daF6995c5188C9C28 https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3b21f8c54c50ce30e57dbf8a8f69a5351d44d3c7db56495a9c84a959478c8f61
Bonanzabits did not send ETH to Prod, but he sent him merits.
He became a member in just a week, very successfully received 10 merits from be.open (1), Sancho18 (5), Kutkh (1) and Bonanzabits (3). And on the same day he became a member he sent 4 merits to be.open.
Bonanzabits
Between this and then:
- After 9 months of bounty in different signature campaigns, with 5 accounts (3 member and 2 Full member) - real profit is 1500 bucks, the rest is shit tokens.. I don't know what's next, will go to growth or will not - don't know, will hold, there is nothing more to do. I hope you have a more interesting picture.. Sorry for the nagging, but I'm upset.. I'm not discouraged, I will continue to work of course, but the ass burns as hell.
http://archive.md/8igFv- After 9 months of bounty in different signature campaigns, with 5 accounts (3 member and 2 Full member) - real profit is 1500 bucks, the rest is shit tokens.. I don't know what's next, will go to growth or will not - don't know, will hold, there is nothing more to do. I hope you have a more interesting picture.. Sorry for the nagging, but I'm upset.. I'm not discouraged, I will continue to work of course, but the ass burns as hell.
Look at the pages Prod, Kutkh and Bonanzabits and see, that they are decorated in one style on 100%:
http://archive.md/4f6qm http://archive.md/jT1AL http://archive.md/rcEFC
Besides
Prod:
Date Registered: November 26, 2017, 03:11:43 PM
Last Active: November 07, 2018, 05:34:14 PM
Kutkh:
Date Registered: November 26, 2017, 04:09:31 PM
Last Active: November 07, 2018, 05:36:15 PM
The pages contain ETH addresses. And its clear that Bonanzabits from his address 0xBE96A5d1aD23142e7Ed0b25fe28C4478B7318170 sent ETH to Kutkh 0xEB82E662bAfdab04A6190E8daF6995c5188C9C28 https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3b21f8c54c50ce30e57dbf8a8f69a5351d44d3c7db56495a9c84a959478c8f61
Bonanzabits did not send ETH to Prod, but he sent him merits.
be.open answer:
~I do not have and never had access to these accounts (Prod, Kutkh и Bonanzabits), but I know whose they are and this is my good friend, thanks to the advice of which I myself came to the crypto. But he ended up on the forum later than me, and as a token of gratitude I helped to start a forum career (so he calls pumping botfarm by merits - clarification from KTChampions) for him and asked Sancho to help him a little. ~
~By the way, here are two campaigns where be.open and his friend bot owner Bonanzabits participated together:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18VGKXNLd-XH8QA4o24tEtbnbKqdgfrZ-73xmSvGpxR0/edit#gid=1415290917
#414 и 419
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vXJNIQAc4tRHQaUcdaKrcPObS_gK3frz9kGnxdmwALQ/edit#gid=450365382
#7 и 16
And a little more about honesty:
And finally:
Topic Election of an additional moderator
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18VGKXNLd-XH8QA4o24tEtbnbKqdgfrZ-73xmSvGpxR0/edit#gid=1415290917
#414 и 419
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vXJNIQAc4tRHQaUcdaKrcPObS_gK3frz9kGnxdmwALQ/edit#gid=450365382
#7 и 16
And a little more about honesty:
~
stunned, here i get tired of working with one .. but 5!
Well this is how much you have to post
about 100 posts per week.
Did you have to go through KYC ?
I did not go through KYC, and I am not going to do it, but if I have to, I will use other people's IDs. IMHO, its worthless for a cryptanarchist to do a KYC ... five accs (3 member and 2 Full member)
stunned, here i get tired of working with one .. but 5!
Well this is how much you have to post
And finally:
Topic Election of an additional moderator
Quote from: Bonanzabits
Here is an ideological and active person. I learned a lot from him. Suggest him, maybe he will agree .. Roll Eyes
be.open
be.open
I cant know how many people are behind these five accounts, but the fact is that they are all connected and engaged in shady / fraudulent activities.
These are not isolated errors. This is a systematic violation of forum rules and deception of other users.
Now that I have a bit more time, I'll share my opinion on this thread.
I have a hard time believing any Bounty thread that promised $1,000 in their made-up Token per week, and since they thrive on spam, I don't think they even mind if someone joins with more than one account.
Cheating [BOUNTY]🔶Crowd Genie🔶 campaign
How did he/they cheat the bounty? In the thread, I don't see any limitations on the number of accounts anyone can use. It may be unethical, but I don't think it's against the rules.I have a hard time believing any Bounty thread that promised $1,000 in their made-up Token per week, and since they thrive on spam, I don't think they even mind if someone joins with more than one account.
Quote
3 | Twitter accounts must be original. Fake, dead, inactive and bot accounts will not be accepted.
Obviously be.open/Sancho18 have violated this rule.
Perhaps the bounty manager and the company that holds the bounty are not against it, but the rules are written clearly. The fact is that they were violated.
These are the posts:
~
I can't read it, but considering the low amount of Merit, and the fact that some of those posts were Merited by others too, I can't say this is a clear case of Merit abuse.
~
I can't read it, but considering the low amount of Merit, and the fact that some of those posts were Merited by others too, I can't say this is a clear case of Merit abuse.
Father and son communicate on the forum and send merit for good messages to each other? The very idea of this seems very strange to me.
Quote
3 | Twitter accounts must be original. Fake, dead, inactive and bot accounts will not be accepted.
Obviously be.open/Sancho18 have violated this rule.I can't read most of their posts, but based on the amount of Merit they received, they must have been contributing something to this forum. And I think we must guard against scaring off users for relatively small things.
When you have a "son" who generously sends you merits, and when you have a "friend" with a whole farm of accounts, then of course it is easier to get merits than honestly having one account.
Please read the post I quoted at the beginning of the post. It's not just "little sins."
I suggest to give this user (or these users?) the benefit of the doubt, and a chance to help improve this forum, and turn this into neutral tags.
A user with a red tag can bring benefit to this forum just like a user without a red tag. And it seems to me when we forgive some obvious violator, we do much more harm to the forum than good, as ordinary participants feel that there is no objectivity, but there is a hierarchical system. All users are equal, but some users are more equal than others. (c)