What is important here is a syntax typo resulting from an edit, and some tertiary precident, not the constitution itself, directly quoted, of course. If you will notice you didn't actually refute what I said, you just repeated yourself and made a series of personal attacks. P.S. Zero Hedge focuses on economics, not law.
I apologize, I did not mean to attack your person. I meant to attack your sloppy attempt at an ad hominem and your ridiculous cherry-picking of the Constitution that appeared to be lifted from some conspiracy blog. I apologize if that wasn't Zero Hedge. I shall make a note to myself that you read more than one conspiracy blog. I also apologize that you don't feel sufficiently refuted. There is only so much I can do if you refuse to acknowledge or read things that you don't like. I have long ago accepted that you are never ever wrong.
It doesn't matter if I read it from a tattoo on your mama's ass, it is a direct quote from The US Constitution. Its validity is not dependent on 3rd parties that reference it. Run along now with your hive mind buddies and work on your next attack strategy.