The 210 were refunded the same day September 3rd!
That's not a refund by any definition of the word.
Please quote the real world definition where it says that deducting claims from each other is not refunding?
Here is the contractional info I found:
"Who did I scam?"
h4ns
"How did I scam?"
My suspicion substantiated when he asked me to borrow him 10. For the second time (September 3rd).
"When did the scam happen?"
July 2019
h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance. If I would have scammed h4ns
July 2019, then his suspicion would have been substantiated July 2019, but he says that his suspicion substantiated
September 3rd, so according to h4ns a scam happened
September 3rd and not July 2019

You support the scam, so you need to know when the scam happened?
July 2019 or
September 3rd?