not bothering to read anything, and just parroting what your hive mind buddies are saying.
How could I be parroting if I didn't read anything as you seem to think. Bit of false reasoning on your part it seems.
The subpoenas don't exist, they are requests with no force of law. Of course you know this because you didn't just skip reading the actual "subpoenas" and jump right into parrot mode now did you?
I read the actual subpoena. I looked at that "form". But I also went and read a bunch of stuff about what a congressional subpoenas is, what it means, how courts treat them etc etc etc. You seem to be the uneducated one in this as all your talking points are straight from the right wing media and those that traffic in "conspiracy theories".
Oh Pelosi wants to prevent a shit show? Well clearly she is doing a fine job! If she wanted it over as soon as possible, she would just call a vote, no one is stopping her, but as I explained and you promptly ignored, she can't do that because if would expose widespread corruption within the Democrat party.
From my understanding, the only vote she has to call is the actual impeachment one since, nothing is laid out in the constitution except that congress can do it how they want. Why do you have such a hard time seeing that. Seems that you simply want to hold onto your opinion as it suits your bias.
You don't really get this whole thing, period. You have no problem having strong opinions about it though now do you? Again, you don't have the slightest fucking clue what you are talking about and just want to join the collective parrot symphony. I explained all of these things you are criticizing using the ACTUAL supposed subpoena documents as well as actual subpoena forms. The additional articles are just there to demonstrate I am by far not the only one saying this. OF COURSE they are all "right wing" do you really think CNN or The Huffington Post wold report on this even if they knew it was true? OF COURSE NOT. Attacking the source or the lean of the source is not a valid argument. Your appeal to authority fallacy in sourcing Newsguard is not a valid argument either.
How about you give me balanced legal arguments from actual legal sources from both sides so I can then make up my own mind. You won't though as you seem to only reference opinion crap that suit your purposes. You'll just make some personal attack as justification for not doing that when in fact you can't.
Also, you will notice, you didn't actually refute anything I said
I did. Ranting and raving like a lunatic claiming I don't know anything while not providing any solid information to back up your claims does not make you right. It just shows that you're unwilling to have a rational debate about these things.
The real funny thing is that you seem to have reading comprehension issues. I actually agreed with you on several points. But for some reason you are unwilling to admit that congressional subpoenas are different than "legal" ones. I was going to post links about what they are and what "powers" they have but I wanted to see if you would go and research it yourself. You didn't. You don't care about facts. You don't care about expanding your knowledge. You only provide information that confirms your opinion. Makes me think at this point that you simply seek to rant at people, call them names and the like cause they don't believe everything you do and that's all you care about. You only want to "win" like a true keyboard warrior.