Actually, it matters a great deal whether committee meetings are open or secret. Now you are arguing something like "Whatever my team does is right and I'll defend it."
I don't have a team.
Most likely the reasoning behind secret is to amass a pack of lies and then dump it at a strategic moment for political effect.
Republicans sit on the committees and so are taking part in the interviews asking questions as well. But I guess there could be in on some
mass conspiracy if that's what you're proposing. Or maybe you're just blissfully unaware of what's actually going on.
Since this has been backfiring on the Dems
Oh? I don't see anything backfiring at all. I do see the right running around not knowing what the hell to do.
You are not going to be able to win that argument by taking refuge in what is "legal." As you have seen, there are various forum members that can easily debate the details of the legal arguments.
You're not arguing anything so there's nothing to win. At least Tecshare can come up with some stuff that can be looked into. You just spout off nothing of value. And no, there really aren't any that I've seen so far. Not one can come up with a solid legal argument. It's funny. Judge Andrew Napolitano was on Fox and Friends saying all the same sort of stuff I and others have been pointing out. Google shows the videos being on fox news but it appears Fox has removed them lol.
As I pointed out, the obvious outcome of Pelosi breaking all the rules is the senate with the "sole ability to try the impeachment" just giving Pelosi one big raised middle finger.
She's not breaking any rules. If you have proof she is, then provide it or just stop wasting our time with "opinion". As for what the senate does, that's perfectly fine as that's within their authority.