The dynamic situation of cryptocurrency these days in general responded by three ways: selling panicly with the risk of cut-loss in order to save the remaining assets from more fallen, hold the assets and playing save by not doing any trading activities, and view the phenomenon as a diamond chance then buying coins in huge amounts of investments while the prices are low. Of course, those three ways are logically humane and each has their own pluses and minuses.
I am intrigued upon the first two: panic selling and postponing from trading.
On doing panic selling, ones tend to sell their assets in the price lower than in the actual price. The main goal is to sell their coins faster to save themselves from the worse situation, without consideration upon the impact of their behaviour towards the market in general.
Meanwhile, ones could also hold their assests and postpone from doing any trading activities, in order to keep their assets safe and even maybe went on hiatus from digital assets bussiness while waiting for the bullish days to be back. They don't want to sell their assets in low price, but the act of not doing any trading is logically also has impact in general. At least, it is contributing on slower the trading traffic.
In your opinion, which one is the worse way among the two?
I agree with what you say, it's humane if someone holding a coin does the three things that you say. I myself have felt panicked because of falling prices, and what I did was sell to secure what was left. I also survived when prices fell because I speculated that prices would soon rise again. You ask which is worse than both actions. In my opinion, selling because of panic is the worst way for traders. when we panic, there seems to be no way out and want to sell immediately. if you decide to survive, it means someone is still willing to find and learn what will happen next. so one can speculate that prices will go down or up again. in my opinion, selling out of panic is of no benefit to someone who trades.