The topic has to be opened again.
Sancho is my sons account, now he is 17, and for him, participating in the bounty campaigns was something like a fun game ~
When you manage to interest your 15-year-old teenage son into engaging in any joint activities,~
Checking
Sancho18's messages revealed that it was a lie.
be.open claims that he engaged his
15-year-old son to the crypto in a game form through participation in bounty campaigns.
Sancho18 Date Registered: June 02, 2017, 15 years old, new to crypto.
On
July 8th, he already has a diversified portfolio consisting of bitcoin, top altcoins and exotic crypto shit. Top altcoins are on Bittrex and he is actively trading them.
In October, he already has a full Bitcoin node on a separate laptop.
A lot of messages devoted to trading on Bittrex and it follows from them that he has been doing this for a long time.
He advises friends (apparently also schoolchildren) to think about a retirement strategy. A
lot of various messages that say that an adult writes from this account. Given the fact that the vocabulary, topics and even events about which the posts are written coincide, I conclude that this is be.open.
~ I have a little bit of NEX and ARDX on my bittrex account,~
~
There are a few NEX on bittrex, ~
Now a small visualization of the merits movement between accounts:

From be.open we "know":
1.) sne.su is his alt.
2.) Sancho18 is his son.
3.) Prod, Kutkh and Bonanzabits is a
farm of his friend.
Who is
more^power?
Bonanzabits Last Active:
October 18, 2019, 10:02:56 PM http://archive.md/bbpu8Prod Last Active:
October 18, 2019, 10:02:15 PM http://archive.md/oiNMaKutkh Last Active:
October 18, 2019, 10:03:54 PM http://archive.md/60Lsmmore^power Last Active:
October 18, 2019, 10:03:26 PM http://archive.md/8ESBL~
Tell me, will the weekly progress be somehow indicated in the tables of the signature campaign, or will everything be calculated at the end? It seems that there was a demand to write less evenly throughout the entire campaign, in which case it would be logical to mark weekly stakes for the participants.
http://archive.md/Pw3WA# 3 19/10/2017 13:10:26 more^power Junior/Member 0x5aEDa141CeB7323825fB57F8C0faE9a0A97a1674
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19qjAXtTdGzh4RJWpnh26npNkiCb-9VZHJuiA_94qTpE/edit#gid=1268945142As previously established, this wallet belongs to be.open/Sancho18
Cheating [Bounty]MODULE- Using multi-accounts, spam, bots and so on are strictly prohibited, all attempted users will be banned.
# 25 27.07.2018 15:55:52 more^power Full Member 0x8D176194f1a20072009ed8DD958C7301fded9c5C
# 343 26.07.2018 13:47:21 be.open Sr. Member 0x32971bEd557C6A8dA1c5C8c4053b68ce610FDe76
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rPq9cUMrDiOIRI0pw3R1fjb8bKWymkl_rKNPJIMULyY/edit#gid=1318387486Cheating AdSana bountyMultiple accounts are not allowed and will result in banning you from our campaign.
#20 Sancho18 0x32971bEd557C6A8dA1c5C8c4053b68ce610FDe76
#28 More^power 0x8D176194f1a20072009ed8DD958C7301fded9c5C
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17FYhxddLNYRZaBGz_hb_52Xlvt04J6u6_dLbnKImY98/edit#gid=1050052320In addition to all this, there is an interesting nuance -
plagiarism.
Пpиcoeдиняюcь, paз вce тaк cлoжнo. Xopoшaя paбoтa, чeлoвeк вмecтo пoнимaния cвoeй вины, yпepтo дoкaзывaeт oбpaтнoe. Бpaт, cвaт... вce этo былo.
Bceгдa yвaжaлa мнeниe Coolcryptovator .
Кaк гoвopил Бeнeдикт Cпинoзa, "ccылкa нa aвтopитeт нe ecть дoвoд".~
http://archive.md/5LcrnA тo, чтo пpeдлaгaeтe вы, вызoвeт гaлoпиpyющyю инфляцию, и этo нe pитopичecкий вoпpoc.
Cкaжитe этo Цyкepбepгy ))
Инфляция вызoвeт дeфицит тoвapoв - пpoизвeдyт eщe.
B нaшe вpeмя пpoизвecти тoвap - нe пpoблeмa. Пpoблeмa eгo пpoдaть.
Mы живём вo вpeмeнa кpизиca пepeпpoизвoдcтвa. Toвapы ecть, a дeнeг y людeй нeт. Taк-чтo инфляция тyт нe cтpaшнa. Hyжнo coздaть изoбилиe дeнeг.
Кaк гoвopил Бeнeдикт Cпинoзa, "ccылкa нa aвтopитeт нe ecть дoвoд".~
http://archive.md/ZvendGoogle search by this phrase
gives out 3 results:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1955840.0 Sancho18 on btt
https://popgun.ru/viewtopic.php?t=798397&start=120 be-open on popgun
http://guns.allzip.org/topic/5/1906656.html and this message on mirror.
So:
1.) If be-open from popgun is an individual person then be.open/Sancho18 should be banned.
2.) If be-open from popgun is be.open from btt then Sancho18 should be banned.
3.) If be-open from popgun is Sancho18 from btt then be.open should be banned.
4.) If this is one person, then he must somehow prove it.
It seems to me that the ideal option is to ban all these users (along with the alts) and if someone wants to return to the forum, he will solve this issue in Meta. I dont think that he/any of them will tell the truth here.