[Usual deflection tactics]
This time, I won't entertain your deflection tactics. I've already done so
before to try and help you with your problem with referencing, after
confronting you about this
twice already.
Therefore, as I
previously explained, I would be leaving you negative feedback for your lack of willingness to be accountable for your claims:
Made serious accusations about a project without a single reference (msg52799029). The user was given a total of 72 hours to provide sources as evidence but was not capable of doing so, despite repeated requests (refs: msg52808483, msg52810914, msg52816768), as well as contradictory evidence. Clearly believes they can make unfounded accusations and use deflection tactics to avoid accountability.
(Continued) Neutral feedback left as this user is not at risk of trading with, but likely to make allegations without references that would be damaging to current or future scam accusations. Doesn't appear to understand that you can't make false accusations, even if a project is scam, or accused of such. As soon as you are either able to provide evidence, or retract your accusations, I will amend/remove my feedback when notified.
All the best.
References:Deeponion Scam Scheme:
1. Copy/paste coin from github.
2. Premine 90% of coins.
2. Hire an army of paid shills via fake airdrop.
3. Pay them for any work by premined coins.
4. After all necessary work is done, exclude all so called aiedrop participants from the list and replace them by alt accounts and airdop coins to yourself.
5. Stake pemined coins
6. Sell all premined coins for millions of dollars. (Except of tinny amount given to airdrop participants aka paid shills)
7. Start a new scam project.
Total cost of the project = 0 (Only announcement thread was needed.)
Total income = More than 10 000 000 UDS
1. First RequestI would very much appreciate references (evidence) with your response, given the situation with the out-of-date scam accusation.
2. Second RequestI would very much appreciate references (evidence) with your response, given the situation with the out-of-date scam accusation.
I would very much appreciate references (evidence) with your response, given the situation with the out-of-date scam accusation.