Requiring two or more DT2 members does little to nothing to address the problem of sockpuppets. A DT1 user can make as many DT2 users as he likes. One malicious DT1 user could quite easily create/find multiple accounts to add to DT2 to achieve their desired result.
Thanks for pointing that out, I was meant to include the following requirement for DT2 exclusion too but forgot:
- Must be distrusted more than trusted by DT2 members
- Must have distrust greater than 2 DT2 members
- Distrusting DT2 members must be trusted by different DT1 members
This would resolve the sockpuppet problem unless I'm agian mistaken. OP updated again.
If a DT2 can't include you DT2 then how he will exclude you.
Same as a DT1 member can't include another DT1 member, but can (collectively) exclude them.
And if DT2 voting is enough to become DT2 [...]
Again, this is not what I said. To avoid regurgitation:
With this proposal, DT2 depth would still be chosen by DT1.