Newbie to post on this website yes but I visit a lot, this is what I actually consider the biggest critic of any project and it's always good to see the opinion of the biggest critic to weigh into the factors.

But as anyone here would know there have certainly been a lot of legitimate projects have allegations thrown at them. In your allegations you call the owner "super scammer" but where is the proof of this?

There is a very fine line between a scam project and a badly run legitimate project, also between a scam project and a project that gives fakes advertising to gain attention.

With you weightless allegations, as in what real evidence have you provided that it is a scam project and not just a legitimate project giving false advertising to try and boost the project? Nothing it's just your opinions and others opinions and a couple of people who had problems withdrawing , but did they withdraw eventually? I'm sure plenty of people have made successful withdrawals.

I noticed and I'm not sure if you wrote it or one of the sheep that jumped on your band wagon but talks about being able to withdraw CND tokens as if you can't it's a scam project. Now who ever wrote that I couldn't be bothered finding it is a noob. A tiny amount of research and it is easy to find that the tokens are able to be used on the exchange 24th December the day after final distribution. So please before you go running your mouth make sure you know what your talking about.

Personally these Jolly big allegations come with tiny amounts of evidence and a bunch of hearsay. I have read all the review websites and spent many hours learning everything I could about this project which I don't think you have done. Only one review suggests anything suss buy unlike you doesn't go pointing a finger just highlights a few factors that could been seen as suss, also have many legitimate reasons.

My conclusion is that it is most likely a legitimate project and I would be very surprised if those volumes are even close to real and yes maybe they pushed that one a little far but I personally don't hold that against them as I'm convinced all exchanges buff up the volume. With the status quo it is a must. Binance has its token listed on Coinsbit and it would be very interesting to see what their big wigs are saying, that would certainly expose a lot of fact.

So please jolly go ahead and reply to my message with a heap of links from this website that hold just as much weight as your allegations if you feel that's what is the best thing to do. Personally I feel that you should post allegation threads unless you are going to bring compelling evidence to say the least. I feel the effort and evidence you have provided is extremely noob.

I believe you have this wrong and if so are you going to apologize for running your mouth with half assed research, even less evidence to back it. If in the not so far future this project is undeniably legitimate?

So for the greater good of the crypto world balance out factors such as how much damage you can do to a legitimate project vs how many noobs you might save from being scammed by one project, they will get scammed elsewhere at some point anyway if they where silly enough to be vulnerable before you might of saved them, but do those type of cannon fodder actually even ever visit this website and read your posts? Not very likely.