Given the Satoshi posts on this forum are clear that increasing the block size would be done only when it was clear that there was enough VALID transaction data to warrant it and the comment about limiting spam makes it clear to me that it was never supposed to be "unlimited" but instead be done in steps as it grew. That alone is enough for me to know that SV is not Satoshi's "vision". As for CW. Yeah. Far to many lies and trying to con people to be able to believe he's real. He's just a con man. Come January I'm sure he'll come up with some new phony excuse for not having the keys.

...snip...

I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea.  So much of the design depends on all nodes getting exactly identical results in lockstep that a second implementation would be a menace to the network.  The MIT license is compatible with all other licenses and commercial uses, so there is no need to rewrite it from a licensing standpoint.