The blame realistically needs to squarely fall on the shoulders of Yobit. I think it is still silly that a 300+ participant campaign has a single manager moderating it. It needs two, minimum.
Its not going to make any difference if they appoint multiple manager for their campaign where actually chances of changing shitposters habit is 1%. Managers only can follow strict selection process to choose best participants for their campaign. If you want to educate low quality poster than its probably a meaningless try. Yeah its true that sometime its hard to go with a proper selection process but managers have the power to remove them or disqualify their post.
For yobit if you just look at its best side then i can say that we have been introduced with a lot of shitposters and you can easily find them by visiting yahoo's thread
List of banned participants in the Cryptotalk Campaign and actually i am not seeing the necessity of having multiple manager.
In fact, not 300 participants, but
more than 500 are participating in the CryptoTalk signature. If additional managers were required, then for yahoo 62278 there would not be a problem to take such. He still uses the services of volunteers and even found an opportunity
to pay for their assistance.
Might I add, Yobit Sig is not the only campaign he manages--there are 2 more campaigns under him. So it's going to be a lot of work. Not only he checks the quality of posts of participants to be eligible; he also creates its spreadsheets (except for Yobit); then he has to ban/warn people, creates a list of it; and ultimately, read thousands of PMs. That man is a living AI (just kidding).
Recently Yobit announced that the eligible number of posts will be reduced to 10:
Update: limit from now is only 10 posts / day
And yahoo62278, is requesting for a merit requirement--to filter out the participants:
I will still try to push for a merit requirement as well