OK. Then how many years away are you before publishing a whitepaper, or having a Github repo available for contributors, or a Proof of Concept?
I'm not away from anything, WE are away. I'm doing my part and will continue doing it, what's yours?
We? No. This is you until you convince the community to follow you. How do we know you're not trolling with Collaborative-POW, blockchain-sharding, and with the other "great" ideas?
I'm not a fan of whitepapers, it has been a while, in bitcoin and cryptocurrency whitepapers are neither white nor a paper, rather a colorful advertisement for running ICOs and making dirty money by scamming people and hurting bitcoin ecosystem.
Satoshi made a whitepaper, and many other scientists do, to present their ideas.
I'll formalize core protocols in step #3 and Github repo is scheduled for step #5 as I've clarified above
To be crystal clear:
1) I'm not under any form of a contract, it is not a scheduled project with budget and time tables.
OK. Would "within 20 years" be a fair estimate?
2) I won't do anything about it without a minimum of community support/contribution, why should I? After all, WE are in step #1 i.e. discussing outlines and finding more contributors.
You have a Proof of Concept, whitepaper? How can we know if we can support it?
Now my question: If we could have a better bitcoin in terms of scaling, decentralization and privacy without touching or hurting legacy bitcoin, without spreading FUD, without consuming legacy bitcoin resources while we are helping and strengthening legacy bitcoin, what would be your responsibility?
I mean other than naysaying and accusing peers of being incompetent or the project being vaporware?
Am I wrong to be cycnical with the kind of social-engineering attacks, and trolling within the community?
I'm here to learn, and grow.