Looks like someone did that and it now includes people who didn't contribute a single line of code to the satoshi client (which the little box is all about).
hmm, perhaps the Bitcoin article should be renamed to Bitcoin client to reflect that it is about the client and not about Bitcoin? -or- split the article into two, one about the satoshi client and another about Bitcoin in general? That should prevent confusion regarding names of people since there are many separate developments for bitcoin in which all such developments are developed by developers.
Actually, the article probably
should be about the concept/protocol/network, and not the client. What makes the Satoshi client notable? Pretty sure all the notable sources talk about Bitcoin itself, not some client.