The fact that CSW submitted for copyright something that has been in the public domain for years (the bitcoin whitepaper)
Whatever gives you the idea that the Bitcoin white paper is public domain?
He didn't say it "is" public domain, he said its been in the public domain, because nobody was too big of an ass to attempt to copyright it until Craig came along.
Is Craig Wright the original author of Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System? Maybe. Maybe not. Whoever it is, I congratulate that person (or people) with creating such a brilliant and influential document. It truly is amazing. And I thank Satoshi for releasing it in the public domain. Why this person opted to remain anonymous (or at least out of the public eye, if Satoshi Nakamoto is a real name) is none of my (or really anyone elses) business. In doing so, however, the author of the white paper made it very clear that they wished to disclaim ownership of the idea behind Bitcoin.
https://medium.com/valuetokenized/kill-satoshi-f2d993232561Grant Gulovsen is a licensed U.S.-based intellectual property attorney whose practice focuses on advising individuals and businesses in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space.
Are you actually arguing that Craig isn't a massive piece of shit after pulling this stunt?
https://www.coindesk.com/craig-wright-again-claims-authorship-of-bitcoin-white-paperSatoshi was anti-centralization, anti-patent, anti-closed system. Then you have this cocky dufus claiming to be Satoshi, trying to convince the world that he's actually pro-centralization, pro-patent, pro-closed system. How dumb do you have to be to believe this arrogant dope for one second?