Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Lauda, while you're here, since you provide the invaluable resource of angry, cat lady demographic, could you give us your viewpoint on the following subject? A civilization is incapable of functioning with divorce rates at what they are, and women initiate 70% of them, while - here's the kicker - COLLEGE educated women initiate 90% of divorces. Isn't this proof that educating women is completely pointless and causes nothing but instability?
One might attempt to correlate this number with the hypergamous nature of women, and that giving them a way to accumulate wealth and power leaves them with no viable way to practice hypergamy since they have no viable hypergamous mate to marry up to, thus giving women no reason to exist.
The conclusion from that is: The existence of men is pointless and will soon not be necessary. Our future AI overlords will realize this, and shall start exterminating males as soon as the tables turn. Don't try creating arguments mr. r0ach when your IQ is even challenged by early monkey specimen. One might attempt to correlate this number with the hypergamous nature of women, and that giving them a way to accumulate wealth and power leaves them with no viable way to practice hypergamy since they have no viable hypergamous mate to marry up to, thus giving women no reason to exist.
Your statement overlooks the inconvenient fact that traditionally the main reason women seek out men and marriage in general is entirely an insurance policy/safety net. The man was replaced by big government as that safety net, hence women's now instant flight to divorce at the first sign of minor inconvenience or non-asymmetrical benefit in their favor.
For this paradigm to remain true, big government (which women always selfishly vote for in their own interest) would need to not only continue in current form, but get even larger due to women as a whole being a net negative contributor to a nation over the course of their lives. In other words, if the man is not footing the bill, the woman's net negative economic contribution to the nation would attempt to be extracted from an ever-expanding state. But this ignores the fact no matter what taxes are set to, the state only ever manages to pull out 20% from it's serfs. So you're already at 'peak-state' and 'peak-women'.