This doesn't answer my question. Where did h4ns lie? How did he defame you?
If you are not able to tell at what day and how the scam happened, then this obviously and logically confirms that h4ns lied!

Because if h4ns did not lie and did not intentionally mislead 80 extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts, then they should not have any problem to tell at what day and how the scam happened, right?

You claim to have refunded the 210 by deducting it from the compensation in relation to a defamation campaign.
Since you are unable to substantiate the existence of this defamation campaign, it only makes sense that you should refund the 210 directly. Otherwise, you are merely a scammer.
Reminder:
Yes, only extremely mentally ill and or brain dead brains claim that someone did something and are not able to quote it!

We have already stated multiple times that you were unable to return the money on June 30th despite not having won the case. Feigning ignorance begets the same and should you continue with incontinent attitudes, I see no reason to respond otherwise.