The point is not that. The point is why would I get kicked out of a campaign where I was following every rule? I did come out of the wood but I did not spam. I even earn merit from suchmoon when I come back. So why should everyone else get a chance to earn from that campaign and I kicked out because of one bully?
I dont expect the community to stick out their neck for me. Not many people know me here. But I hope at least the man that is managing a large campaign like this, would be fair. Am I wrong to assume that?
My first post in this thread is expressing my opinion that he's wrong in this case, and I don't feel like expressing my honest opinion is "sticking my neck out." It's just my opinion, like Timelord's review is his own.
But I think you're missing the point of the forum. By your own admission you only came here to earn a few sats, rather than to be a participant in the community and discussion of bitcoin. It's my opinion that alone makes you a spammer, regardless how many merit you earn and from whom.
I thought the philosophies of a libertarian forum like this would be more in line with famous jurist William Blackstone's ratio:
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
I like that, and although I don't describe myself as a libertarian I tend to agree with the sentiment. But the trust system isn't a court of law. No one is going to jail because Timelord leaves a negative review on his trust wall. We are all adults, and we are all entitled to take every review any way we choose.
I have my reasons for valuing Timelords efforts. I run a business here that leaves me very vulnerable to those who abuse alt accounts. So, yeah I find "his efforts are a tremendous contribution." I may have my selfish reasons, but I also expressed that "I may not always agree with his findings." If you're going to quote me, please be thorough, not selective.