I know of no 'climate denier' who thinks that the earth is flat. 'Flat Earth' is a psy-op developed specifically to associate with people who don't go along with the corp/gov line on such things as 'global warming', 'vaccines', etc.
Ahahahahahahahahahahaahahaha.
Global warming deniers == vaccines deniers. It's your words, are you?
That's not at all what I said. I said that both 'global warming' and 'vaccines' are programs which are highly important to corp/gov and it is critical that people not question them. One method to get a fairly large segment of people to not question them is to invent something like 'flat earth', then try to associate questions about these programs with the ridiculous 'flat earth' invention. Although it is quite an obvious technique, It works and works well on the weak minded.
To answer your question, I happen to be very skeptical of the corp/gov story on both the calamitous nature of 'global climate change', and the safety of mass vaccinations. The propaganda technique is to try to 'shame' people about having any questions at all about the 'authorized position' on these. I'm not ashamed of it at all.
I have one interesting thought in my mind: If some people denies the fact of global warming which is not denied by any famous scientists, why in that case they must believe to that scientists in terms of vaccines or shape of Earth?
Freeman Dyson is famous enough for me. And there are many many others as anyone who studies this issue will find out.
Again, nobody questions the shape of the earth. It's an invented canard, but is also a great way to identify people who are almost fer certain working for the corp/gov propagandists.
If scientists corrupted - they lying about everything else (is this not obvious?). So, if you denies climate change than you in the "ark" with vaccine deniers, conspiracy theorists, flat earth sect and others who fighting with deep state goverment and reptilians.
About global warming: This is real, you can check it by yourself, just take a look to average temperature in your region twenty years ago, forty years ago and in the past century.
But difference is about which leads to this: sun activity or human activity (in real - all both affects).
Of course, representation of global warming in media is often weird, but it not denies the fact of the problem.
About global warming: This is real, you can check it by yourself, just take a look to average temperature in your region twenty years ago, forty years ago and in the past century.
But difference is about which leads to this: sun activity or human activity (in real - all both affects).
Of course, representation of global warming in media is often weird, but it not denies the fact of the problem.
I've seen very little discernible difference in the temperature or climate in the 40 years that I've been able to assess things. Actually, about 5 years ago I did start to notice some fairly bizarre atmospheric conditions which are a direct match for the 'solar radiation management' schemes that are not becoming mainstream.
There is no doubt in my mind that if had been told by mainstream media that the scient-priests were seeing global cooling (and we need to give the rich people power to control the solar flux in order to stop it) then you would 'feel' the cooling just as strongly as you 'feel' the warming now.