Yep, total joke here :p
I have been banned for the Telegram group this week: no trolling, just one question to the persons who participated to the ICO... I asked if it's legal to offer a token with an ICO, receive the money and then increase (a lot!) the supply like they want so everybody is diluted!
I don't care if a token/coin loses its value for a classical reason (no interest, pump & dump, etc.) but first time I see a token where I was owning 2% of the circulating supply (when that was really ~55M) which suddenly has billions and billions (35 recently) of supply "because our payment system needs that" or "because we need test tokens" xD
Personally, I don't really care: I bought after the ICO (1000 for 2% of the supply, the price was already very low but it's seriously worst now!) but for people who invested a lot during the ICO... maybe you can sue them!
