If there is no attempt in debunking them or demonstrating they are untrue, then you must be able to recognize that looks rather bad and actually seems strange that they make up a LARGE portion of most vaunted trust positions on the entire forum??
When something is posted in Meta rather than reputation. Accusations that have been discussed before numerous times. When the thread starts with a poll titled The "Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ?" people are unlikely to take the content seriously. Such thread is likely to be seen with amusement and ridicule.
Accusations regarding reputation and scams have specific boards on this forum . It prevents it being repeated over and over again.
Everyone at some stage has had some sort of accusation leveled against them and it is only fair that it is in the format that is accepted on the reputation or scam boards.
There is a tendency to rehash the same accusations over and over again in multiple threads on various boards when the person making the accusation doesn't get the desired results.
Each DT can only be responsible for their own decisions regarding trust. Getting DT's to agree on something unanimously is like herding cats.
None of those on the OP list I would personally place a flag or tag on. Some people I trust but do not necessarily agree with their conduct - they neither get my trust list nor do I tag them. I only take responsibility for those I specifically trust. As DT1 or DT2 there is no specific duty to tag people and there has to be a level of forgiveness for individual errors in judgement.
And the trust system is only going to work if there's some level of forgiveness and de-escalation.
Owlcatz helped me when I was new to the forum. He said some things that ended up being very helpful in the long run. It was via PM.
They could have easily ignored me as a noob but instead helped a stranger for no benefit or reward.
BRILLIANT and funny post. Keep them coming. Let's take a closer look.
So noticing your time travelling convoluted excuse above failed we now have a NEW BUNCH OF EXCUSES
1. The wrong section - err no this is a poll like the troll poll was that on the incorrect board??. Besides imagine a DT saying " well i see undeniable evidence of scamming but since it is on the wrong board I will ignore it" glad you are keeping everyone safe, you pinnacle of trust.
2. Not presented in a serious way. I mean calling undeniable scammers and scammer supporters and trust abusers DIRTY TURDS is so way off it is going to invalidate the observable instances contained within. I mean of course calling scammers and willing scam facilitators and trust abusers DEFAULT TRUST MEMBERS is far more sensible. Too funny.
3. ACCUSATIONS - LOL these are undeniable observable instances AKA THE TRUTH - which one do you want to discuss first and explain why they do not deserve a tag or flag. Yes this is a direct challenge to you here and now. Let's compare them to people you have tagged or flagged.
4. YOU WOULD NOT FLAG OR TAG undeniable scammers or willing scam facilitators and you are on DT?? when do you put your chipmixer sig on? or have an alt already wearing one?
5. They helped you once HAHAHA well then off course they can do what they want to everyone else and that is just fine. This is out of the mikey handbook. Anecdotal crap that means nothing.
6. Theymos likely meant for miner infractions and petty one off crap that is not observably and undeniable financially high risk, not multiple counts of scamming, and being implicated in extortion and shady escrow and multiple trust abuses. Nor likely willful and deliberate scam facilitating for a price or perhaps not even auction scamming. Like I said bring me examples of those you have flagged and tagged so we can see the evil you are not willing to forgive.
back to the drawing board for you, don't stay away too long though because you are way too much fun...