Where is the part that is relevant to the conversation other than your claims of a tangential relationship? Oh right, there is none, you all are just frothing at the mouth for any opportunity to smite me for daring to have views you don't approve of, and thus you can't even manage to have a conversation about forum policy without injecting politics into it.
Didn't you call some users "communists" earlier in the thread? I look forward to you twisting it into totally not a political thing.
For the record, I fully approve you being a conspiracy nutjob and I don't have any intent to smite you - I'm sorry if it comes across that way.
, once, in the context of it being totally irrelevant to the conversation. Nice try at spin there. I don't much care what you say your intent is, your inability to separate politics from forum policy discussion does all the talking for you.