Did I selectively edit anything out?
Only form your reasoning.
It looks to me like you are saying that you value Timelord's ratings because it personally serves you economically regardless of the negative impact his irresponsible shotgun approach has on others.
Valuing his efforts and condoning his behavior aren't the same thing, which I clearly (and politely) expressed. I don't suspect you have any issues with reading comprehension, so I think you know that. But that doesn't serve your argument, does it?
The rest of your argument is just more postulating, playing on semantics, and throwing insults, so yeah, whatever. You've been trying to get my goat for several weeks now, I'm not gonna let you have it.
No one should blindly trust his feedback without double and/or triple checking them
I couldn't agree more with this statement, but realistically the same could (or should) be said for most of the members of this forum. We're all human, and we're all subject to emotional outbursts. Some, more than others seem to have taken up the habit of turning their emotional outbursts into negative reviews.
I also agree that the accusation about you and Lauda was just silly and petty.
You explicitly said you value his "contributions" for "selfish reasons" in spite of the fact his accusations are unreliable and cause harm to other users. I am sorry if you want to take that back now, but it was your own words, not "form" my reasoning. Also, you didn't bother addressing any of my other quite valid points about you acting all superior and standing in judgement of the lesser plebeians who roam this forum. Convenient you just summarily dismiss that rather than bothering to respond.
P.S. I already have your goat, and if you don't shape up I am going to let Nutilduhh have his way with him.