is it possible that the prize manager and the entire project crew including the developer, they work together and deliberately promote fraudulent projects?
I see how easy they are to erase red trust and promote fraudulent projects repeatedly?
Is this what is called a camouflage manager?
It's hard to actually affirm the fact that the project manager could be conniving together to support a fraudulent project. Its sincerely difficult to say that. I just think some projects find it hard to reach their soft cap. Maybe that's why many of them fold up, bringing disappointment to investors and those involved in bounty campaigns
softcap is not achieved through no fault of the manager, the manager has his own field. so in connection with what you mean (softcup) is not achieved because project funds or investor funds are not enough to develop further project products, such as poor marketing strategies and cannot attract market investment.