Re: Game-Protect.com did not refund my money and stopped replying to my emails
⭐ Merited by Foxpup (3)
Thank you for confirming that a written contract does not exist, because written contracts require signatures from both parties and I am not able to see any! 
Look it is simple, real world people who have studied law do not spam signatures for cents!
They don't borrow 10 neither..
Real world people who have studied law ask to lend BTC worth 10 if they do not have any on hand!
Please show the written contract?
Look it is simple, real world people who have studied law do not spam signatures for cents!
Look it is simple, real world people who have studied law do not spam signatures for cents!
They don't borrow 10 neither..
OP, I suggest you to create a red flag against GP, I will support the flag. Since it was a written contract with you, I would suggest you to go with flag type 3.
Start to create the flag against game-protect from here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;addflag=874254
I will tag him using this post reference and I hope in future no one else falls the victim of game-protect.
The biggest mistake online casino victims can do is listen to extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts! Quote
This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages.
Start to create the flag against game-protect from here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;addflag=874254
I will tag him using this post reference and I hope in future no one else falls the victim of game-protect.
Please show the written contract?
From src: https://www.upcounsel.com/is-an-email-legally-binding
Quote
Most people think of contracts as being formal agreements put into writing and signed by the parties concerned, often with lawyers present, but the fact of the matter is that a contract is merely an agreement between multiple parties concerning an exchange of items of value, and the physical form of the contract is not so important.
Therefore, in theory, a contract could be written upon a napkin just as well as watermarked paper, so long as the terms were stated clearly and agreed to, and oral or verbal contracts are not unheard of (though difficult to enforce and frowned upon by many).
One of the common misconceptions concerning contracts is that a signature is required for a contract to be binding, while actually, all that is required is for both parties to agree upon the terms set out.
Therefore, in theory, a contract could be written upon a napkin just as well as watermarked paper, so long as the terms were stated clearly and agreed to, and oral or verbal contracts are not unheard of (though difficult to enforce and frowned upon by many).
One of the common misconceptions concerning contracts is that a signature is required for a contract to be binding, while actually, all that is required is for both parties to agree upon the terms set out.
This has also been confirmed by the New York Supreme Court along with other courts around the world.
Src: https://www.forbes.com/sites/oliverherzfeld/2013/12/09/are-your-emails-enforceable-contracts/#78e9be184f8a
Quote
Appellate Division stated: given the now widespread use of email as a form of written communication in both personal and business affairs, it would be unreasonable to conclude that email messages are incapable of conforming to the criteria of [New York law] simply because they cannot be physically signed in a traditional fashion.
Simply the words "Game Protect wrote" within your email exchange is enough to be deemed a signature within the eyes of the law. Don't believe me, google it. There are countless cases around the world where *real* judges have deemed that email exchanges without formal signing are still deemed as valid evidence and are held up in the eyes of the law as contracts.
At the end of the day, if you want to argue the verbiage of BitcoinTalk, that's fine. But it still does not defeat the fact that you did not make h4ns wholesome with regards to your obligations towards him/her. Period. You scammed h4ns.