NO social time for you guys on saturday evenings then? lol (just kidding)
All our favs flocking in now. Lafu who just happened to advertising and working with cryptopia right before it exited sucking away millions of investors coins. Hmmmm
perhaps the same was written because it is simply a statement of events how many different ways can this be worded.. WOW another alt of ours you guys have noticed. Of course everyone who voices some kind of legitimate gripe against undeniable double standards is CH or TOAA. Lafu the assfeltcher eating tman ass in public, yes tman all of your undeniable achievements and original thought provoking posts that you will not present, where would the board be without the tourettes poetry you shart out everywhere? I noticed that other dumb shit thepharmacist claiming " the forum just has not been the same without you lauda" haha yes there has been a lack of high level extortion and no huge shady escrow or even massive amounts of trust abusing whilst blowers ... please come back lauda we the DT members need more of this to take place. Tell us more about the time you were on the xcoin launch and you therefore know for sure there was not instamine/premine those lies are the best ones we like you paragon of trust.
The best part is that you all accept the observable instances of financially motivated wrong doing are TRUE because you can not undo observable instances unless you pull a nutildah on them and are PROUD of them. haha
Imagine our Default trust stacked full of those that are guilty of financially motivated wrong doing and do not try to dispute it they simply say we are proud of this and other ass feltching nobodies with zero achievements (well that is pretty much all of DT) begging to be added to the scammers and scammer supporter list because they say this is an honor roll. Haha poor theymos must be scratching his head saying to himself.... " well now that I examine the evidence presented and research it for myself it is indeed undeniable that my systems of control design have enabled a bunch of scammers and scammer supporters to dominate default trust and cream off all the best rev streams for themselves and crush free speech, then hold out anyone that seeks to oppose them and then silence whistle blowers with punishment that I have enabled.
Oh well.
Still waiting for the people making funny excuses we pull apart and cowards who run away, and the derailers to try and debunk some of the observable instances??
How do you guys not notice that we just bitch slap you around and keep making challenges your run away from, even just ask you present one central point of ours you have ever debunked , pull apart your desperate faux screams of trolling, force you into making ludicrous statements that serve as our entertainment.........what more can one do to crush 30-40 scumbags single handed. I mean that's not including your ass kissers and mods you have on the payroll? all crushed in our wake, driven to ignore us whilst running away from public challenges. I mean just BRING ONE CENTRAL POINT WE HAVE MADE THAT ANY OF YOU HAVE DEBUNKED??? how hard can that be??
Nutildah, asks if we are mad?? lol please only post on our threads, you are our fav bitch to slap around. I mean the others have observable instances of scamming etc but your case is just way too brilliant to get bored of. For the small sum of 0.3btc back when btc was worth over 10x less than it is now so perhaps what 300bucks you would a do a 180 on your "strong principles" and by your own words become EVIL and aid deception and facilitate scamming. Was that even 20 piece of silver back then?
Even lauda and tman want more than that to scam don't they?? how much more did you drive the price up in your auction scam tman? I guess we can never know. I wonder how much lauda claiming he was on the xcoin launch and there was no instamine/premine scammed people into investing before he exited and later (years later) said something like " it was too centralized" ... haha no shit sherlock. I bet there were asking for more than 0.3 btc else they would tell some dudes mommy and daddy he had "apparently" been a bad boy. haha
@xl div
Now adopting the SS aproach its seems. Perhaps debunking his retarded excuses after (different) retarded excuse and then demonstrating his " it is meant to be this way" view of the totally faux decentralized systems of control is total moronic and corrupt. His empathy dig slapped back straight in his face as he scored an own goal, NOW he comes crying about ad hominem straight after his own derailing ad hominem gender and identity crisis speculations and fungi jibes. What a total idiot and embarrassment.
Now says he will accept our challenge with some arbiter ( likely tman lauda or nutildah) haha . You do not need and arbiter we will both present ONLY observable instances that are fully verifiable by any member here. Why the need of an arbiter.
I will bring lauda, tman and nutildah WHO YOU DON'T TRY TO DISPUTE ARE GUILTY OF THE OBSERVABLE INSTANCES IN THE INITIAL POST but claim THEY ARE NOT FINANCIALLY HIGH RISK ...all you need to do make sure you have left no negative trust for those that are clearly less of a financial high risk..
I mean so long as we do not find out you are actually INCLUDING ANY OF THOSE ON DT then that should be satisfactory and after the public examination you will not be added to the dirty turds list. I mean is you are not only claiming they are not higher financial risk than those you leave negs for but ALSO ARE CLAIMING these are the actions of the most trusted members here on this forum that would be another problem you have to explain in public.
FAILING TO MEET OUR CHALLENGE MEANS YOU ARE AFRAID UNDER SCRUTINY YOU WILL BE FOUND TO BE CLEARLY CORRUPT .
SO let's get on with it weasel. We will drill this down to purely observable undeniable instances of clear financially motivated wrong doing so you need no arbiter. Unless you plan on bring lies to the table? or things we can not verify for sure. You are going to come with observable instances right not some bogus " well, he looks like he was going to possibly do bad things in the future in my opinion" garbage right?
YES OR NO???
The ONLY arbiter we would accept is THEYMOS even though he claims lauda is simply sub optimal we believe this must be from lack of examining undeniable observable instances. I mean I guess diving out of a plane and forgetting the parachute could be described as sub optimal, I mean hold a gun the wrong way around and aiming down the barrel before pulling the trigger is kind of a sub optimal way to use the gun ( for some). We only accept him so that we get a double advantage of the him giving his specific opinion on specific observable and undeniable instances.
So never mind trying to get one of you corrupt pals to be arbiter. Observable instances need no arbiter.
Now stop stalling. We will start perusing your negative trust allocations. You find your weakest ( the threshold you have for accepting someone is financially high risk) and bring them here now. Pick 3 that will make it easier. Now be sensible , don't come back with trade fortress when we find you have been giving negative trust for lemons love or that will just look really bad on you. We will later allow you to select even your strongest cases for leaving negative trust and see how they match up. However to find the threshold you must bring those you consider to be just over your personal threshold.
Hurry up.
We are looking forward