In the real world it works like this:- If Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, then h4ns's brain would have substantiated that Game Protect is a scam / show around July 2019 and not
September 3rd after I asked him if he can lend me BTC worth 10 the second time!
(September 3rd) My suspicion substantiated when he asked me to borrow him 10. For the second time.
- If the brain of a customer substantiated that Game Protect is a scam / show, then it would withdraw its 7 pending enforcement cases?
