Op, please address the quoted point, because it seems accurate and disturbing. The idea of a game where the last person to enter wins does not seem bad, but all of these time extensions are making it confusing. Some people said that it's obviously a scam where you can be the last one to enter, stop the game and win everything, but if the stopping time is decided automatically, I suppose this is not the case. But what about people throwing in money multiple times using their bots? How would you deal with this issue? And also, why not simplify the game? For instance, make it a game where the last person is an n-th participant where n is a random number within a certain reasonable range (between 1 and 30, perhaps? You can reduce the prize, of course) and n cannot be viewed until the game is over but can be verified afterward. I am not good with the technicalities and perhaps this is a bad idea, but it's just a thought about improving the game.
The whales who have bots will win then. It's now a battle of how much they are willing to put in, or how much the hot wallet of their bot has, as near the end, it will be one whale bot after another whale bot who fights to be the last player. You'll also see some bots doing multiple transactions one after the other just to try to be sure they are the last one in, as I'm guessing the winner is still determined by successful transactions included in the final block.
i dont think a lot of small time players will play on this site as the chance is very slim because of the questionable way of choosing the winner. and if the whales will come in, they will definitely find a way how to rekkt the game.
but looking at the contract address, i dont think he's getting a lot of players atm.
lets wait what this op has to say about Dabs' conclusion of how the game will choose its winner.