Op, please address the quoted point, because it seems accurate and disturbing. The idea of a game where the last person to enter wins does not seem bad, but all of these time extensions are making it confusing. Some people said that it's obviously a scam where you can be the last one to enter, stop the game and win everything, but if the stopping time is decided automatically, I suppose this is not the case. But what about people throwing in money multiple times using their bots? How would you deal with this issue? And also, why not simplify the game? For instance, make it a game where the last person is an n-th participant where n is a random number within a certain reasonable range (between 1 and 30, perhaps? You can reduce the prize, of course) and n cannot be viewed until the game is over but can be verified afterward. I am not good with the technicalities and perhaps this is a bad idea, but it's just a thought about improving the game.