You can't judge projects by how they look,what matters is what they are here to fix in crypto space,i introduced a good privacy altcoin to my friends weeks ago and they neglect it because of its look,the name of the project is sero
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
Of course, you are right in this that you do not need to judge a project by its cover, but you can say so, but what prevents a good project from making a good cover? Saving money or something else? Everyone has the right to doubt, even if the cover is beautiful and the opportunities are good, all this may not be enough to achieve success. Nevertheless, a complex of all characteristics plays a role here, and one should not forget that the final result should be considered the moment when the project has fulfilled all the conditions according to its roadmap. If something in the process changes in favor of the participants, then this is the first hint of deception.