Re: CryptoTalk started paying its users for posting.

Here is his post history: https://cryptotalk.org/profile/41-cryptokram/content/

Some snippets caught by o_e_l_e_o:

Its clearly that they do just really mean about post counts not totally on the quality of those things.For having a 3000+ post in a month then
its no surprise that 99% of them were trash.Its impossible to think that someone would able to make constructive post in a matter of minutest
even how fast he is in typing and thinking into certain topics.Well its their own jurisdiction though even it isnt worth it in our eyes, we cant do anything.

Most of them were generic replies so it won't take even minutes for someone who has good type writting skills.But 3500+ still not imaginable in a month I guess this was done by group of people atleast 5 or 10 so they can take shares for everyone from the rewards,0.1BTC still huge amount for anyone who just shitposting for a month.

5-10 people would post up for single account is overkill. 2-3 person would be possible because if we do just talk for single person then;
its really hard to believe but not impossible for a person who are dedicated to earn $9000+ in a month since he do know that he would
just need to shitpost all the way for the entire month and after that he would cherish that amount on his own after all the shit posting that he had done. Cheesy

I always believed that if you do good and hard work, you will be rewarded good and if anyone cheats or do bad deeds will be punished. But it seems that a person(s) who cheated the bounty, was able to win 1 Bitcoin in the end. It would have been much better if the site admins & Moderators could have looked on more factors rather then just counting the posts blindly.

Moving further i think cryptotalk has gain enough attention and now they should be looking to take steps to improve the quality of posters on their site.
If they can start the highest QUANTITY posting competition, why can they start the Highest QUALITY Posting competition ?