My most recent venture in to the Fox's den has satisfied my masochistic tendencies for quite some time, and thus I cannot bring myself to actually read these walls of text.
Can I get a TL;DR for the last few pages?
TL;DR: verbal diarrhea. I muted him a long time ago so I'm guessing here.
Typical shit post from this slobbering gambling sig spamming dirt bag.
TLDR = If this is too long of a summary for the last 2 pages of public humilation of XLDIV the scammer supporter then tough shit. Get back to spamming your gambling/mixing sigs elsewherexl divs pathetic excuses including the requirement of time travel and other such garbage = we crushed them.
xldiv was asked 3 clear questions apparently he is unhappy with the answers that we tried to extrapolate from his slobbering and moronic excuses, sidetracking and irrelevant garbage. We thought he was saying what we have put in RED he is unhappy with that apparently so his answers are in BLUE now.
1. Do you or have you in the last 3 months included on your trust list lauda, tman or nutildah and do they include or have they included you in the last 3 months? Please answer in full
tman and nutildah and xldiv ALL SUPPORT EACH OTHER ON DT
2. Do you accept that the purpose of negative trust is to place a warning of " financially high risk" or " scammer" ( since those are the 2 messages you get at the top of your threads if you meet certain thresholds theymos has set here for negative trust (old system) or flags (new system)). This is the PRIME and central reason for the negative trust and flagging systems. These are clearly theymos's intentions since they are his own words on the warning banners?
We thought he was trying to say YES Presumably then xldiv says NO because he claims he is not happy with our extrapolated answer but will not explain3. Is someone that lies or intentionally deceives others for their own direct financial gain .. a scammer and financially high risk? yes or no?
we presumed he meant YES with lots of excuses and other blathering on. Presumably then xldiv says NO because he claims he is not happy with our extrapolated answer but will not explain [/color]
XLdiv says presenting undeniable observable instances that are independently verifiable = claiming someone stole and killed a giraffe when all the evidence they have is that insulted a cat.
XLdiv also is fully aware of the auction scamming of tman which he seem to not deny took place, is aware of the strong case of extortion but says he believes tman was just pretending to extort but was really under cover agent, is aware of the admission of tman for trust abusing whistle blowing on his scamming pal and DT include lauda, and is aware that Tman includes another confirmed scam facilitator nutildah , further he is aware TMAN includes XLdiv himself and has a clear motive for supporting scammers. However, he says Tman is has not been financially high risk, does not deserve red trust or a flag, but rather is one of the most trusted members of the forum and should be on default trust.
If that is NOT what he is saying then we welcome XLDIV back here to detail which parts he DOES NOT AGREE WITH NOW...
OH YEAH, XLDIV HAS RUN AWAY because he claims getting his specious excuses and arguments correctly called out for scammer supporting and double standards garbage they are is like being bested at chess by a pigeon apparently.