Well, sportsbet is not just a "pure" crypto bookie, they also accept fiat deposits etc in several countries.
oh yes sorry i see it now.
they never offer pure anonimity betting experience right? my bad, i think everybody should not blame sportsbet.io for asking the kyc procedure. as they are a regulated sportsbook like any other fiat sportsbook that kyc required by law.
so kyc will always required here , seems makes sense with this fact besides they also in partenship with watford where there maybe a lot of customers come from there -ads- .
I guess you right they never offer pure anonymity in betting on this site, but it all depends on you because there you can also play anonymously without giving them KYC. I am sure many gamblers have verified their account without prompting and that is no problem. Sportsbet asked for KYC because most of them had problems or have suspicious activity. On other crypto gambling site, they would definitely ask for KYC if there are players have a problem like that and I think it's natural.
hmmm anybody? have a comment about this? what causing customer in sportsbet.io asked for KYC?
is it necessary to have a problem first and then asked KYC? or on what circumstances exactly? i am a bit curious. i always against the kyc for personal reason , feel free to call me a criminal or something as i far as i can say that i am not , i am just a slave of privacy .
i can feel those people who held account blocked with funds inside even though they guarantee to refund you back the money inside in case you are not comfortable with the KYC procedure , it is frustrating.
KYC makes people frustrating , not because they are criminal refusing to do KYC , it is sometimes just the matter of principle.
A quick search in their Terms and Conditions will provide you details about their KYC and that should be enough to answer your questions (if you open-mindedly understand what they're trying to say).
these Terms and Conditions.