Ninjastic
Home
Search
Users
Boards
Addresses
Ctrl + K
Toggle theme
Open menu
Post
Edited versions
Quotes to this post
Post
53009173
Topic
5186660
Board
Politics & Society
Re: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son
by
TECSHARE
on
07/11/2019, 10:37:52 UTC
Quote from: TwitchySeal on November 07, 2019, 10:22:06 AM
Quote from: TECSHARE on November 07, 2019, 10:18:57 AM
This is an actual subpoena:
https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/(70)%20Chaffetz%20Subpoena%20to%20Pagliano%2009-16-2016.pdf
This is NOT a subpoena:
https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/2019-09-27.EEC%20Engel%20Schiff%20%20to%20Pompeo-%20State%20re%20Document%20Subpoena.pdf
here are the requirements for a subpoena to be actionable:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_45
Quote from: TwitchySeal on November 07, 2019, 09:28:47 AM
Check out the Subpoena Schiff sent Esper:
https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/2019-10-07.eec_engel_schiff_to_esper-dod_re_subpoena.pdf
https://i.gyazo.com/6883d8d48729a8f12ccff4514883f575.png
This is not a subpoena. See links above for why.
Yeah we get it. This is not a subpoena either:
https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/2019-09-27.EEC%20Engel%20Schiff%20%20to%20Pompeo-%20
It doesn't mean they didn't send an actual subpoena.
Great. Document the ACTUAL subpoena then if it exists. Enjoy your snipe hunt.