It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.
Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.
Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.
Does it matter or does it not matter also depends on the person. Some people want to gamble longer without losing too much, some people want to gamble to win money, so how you gamble depends on what you want from gambling. Some people want to just gamble and not care about competition, some people gamble just for competition, and some people gamble both to win and also be part of the competition at the same time.
Now, all of those people also have tens of different methods to approach what they are trying to achieve all of which combined makes for a big amount of ways to gamble. Hence at the end of the day only thing that matters is what you want to achieve with your gambling, if you are going for something specific then you need to do something specific as well.
You're right with what you said which why i advised the mixing of strategy (not mixing things) and avoiding the martingale strategy but the 98% strategy used by
seems to be working seems fine at the moment though.