Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll -The-One-Above-All is Cryptohunter
The relevance of the Cryptohunter question is:
1) You were warned of a ban by Theymos for repeatedly breaking the forum rules.
2) It shows you have had "net negative" effect on the forum for years.
Endless word walls that are negative, combative, deceptive and have little or no substance.
3) It shows you have run threads exactly like this for years and it is nothing "new or interesting" - it is the same information
over and over again. Where you use abuse, distortion, distraction and manipulation to alter what people actually say.
4) You are guilty of the same things you accuse other people of:
a) Pretending to be someone else
Account sales and having alts that are not disclosed are both frowned upon because people are pretending to be someone else.
b) Vouching for yourself
Using an alt to enhance your reputation is symilar as commenting on you own auction.
c) Censorship
Using local rules to distract from the actual issues that you use at the center of your complaint (Censorship and gaining an advantage by pretending to be someone else) so that you can attack and troll specific people that you hold a grudge against.
d) Using an alt in a "sting operation" in a misguided attempt to "entrap" those that you believe are guilty of scamming.
None of which I have tagged you for. Are you accusing me of being complicit in your scam too ?
Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.
Lets look at the evidence.
You (cryptohunter) might've had some case for the trust system being broken if you had handled your initial trust issues with rationality and patience instead of absolutely losing your mind and throwing lies around, and even now I could imagine your red trust eventually being cleared if you were able to attain a stable mindset.
When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":
It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.
So:
Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No
Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.
1) You were warned of a ban by Theymos for repeatedly breaking the forum rules.
2) It shows you have had "net negative" effect on the forum for years.
Endless word walls that are negative, combative, deceptive and have little or no substance.
3) It shows you have run threads exactly like this for years and it is nothing "new or interesting" - it is the same information
over and over again. Where you use abuse, distortion, distraction and manipulation to alter what people actually say.
4) You are guilty of the same things you accuse other people of:
a) Pretending to be someone else
Account sales and having alts that are not disclosed are both frowned upon because people are pretending to be someone else.
b) Vouching for yourself
Using an alt to enhance your reputation is symilar as commenting on you own auction.
c) Censorship
Using local rules to distract from the actual issues that you use at the center of your complaint (Censorship and gaining an advantage by pretending to be someone else) so that you can attack and troll specific people that you hold a grudge against.
d) Using an alt in a "sting operation" in a misguided attempt to "entrap" those that you believe are guilty of scamming.
None of which I have tagged you for. Are you accusing me of being complicit in your scam too ?
Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.
Lets look at the evidence.
You (cryptohunter) might've had some case for the trust system being broken if you had handled your initial trust issues with rationality and patience instead of absolutely losing your mind and throwing lies around, and even now I could imagine your red trust eventually being cleared if you were able to attain a stable mindset.
We see you doing this over and over again. There are 61 good reports against you in the last 60 days. You're going to get banned if you keep this up.
Wait a second, there were still people that thought this stupid cunt WASN'T CH... No wonder so many people get scammed on this fucking site, people are fucking stupid...
In other breaking news water is wet, hookers will fuck you for money etc etc...
In other breaking news water is wet, hookers will fuck you for money etc etc...
This might as well be CH right now:
We feel
When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":
It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.
So:
Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No
Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.