Re: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son
Its not weird because it likely isn't on the internet.
We don't know how long it will be before it will be available on the internet, if ever. There's not a single repository for every single piece of information that is "publicly available" and released by congress.
However, what is weird is your refusal to accept that Mike Pompeo did say as part of public record that he received said subpoena. Your beef really is with him. After all, he's the one that said this, not me:
https://i.imgur.com/P53g4Nh.png
Still waiting for your proof of Pompeo saying Bigfoot is real...
We don't know how long it will be before it will be available on the internet, if ever. There's not a single repository for every single piece of information that is "publicly available" and released by congress.
However, what is weird is your refusal to accept that Mike Pompeo did say as part of public record that he received said subpoena. Your beef really is with him. After all, he's the one that said this, not me:
https://i.imgur.com/P53g4Nh.png
Still waiting for your proof of Pompeo saying Bigfoot is real...
No it is definitely weird, because if it existed I am sure the three of you would not be able to resist posting it here. You are the one holding the premise that the subpoenas exist. Mike Pompeo is irrelevant. The burden of proof is yours regardless of Mike Pompeo and Bigfoot.
https://www.house.gov/
That looks like a "repository for every single piece of information that is "publicly available" and released" by the house. Interesting.
The WH letter also acknowledged the subpoena but argued that it wasn't for legislative purposes and that the inquiry was illegitimate so it didn't have to be honored. They're all liars apparently.
Should also be noted that the court ruled in favor of the impeachment inquiry in terms of handing over the unredacted Muelar report so they could fulfill their oversight/impeachment responsibilities.
Should also be noted that the court ruled in favor of the impeachment inquiry in terms of handing over the unredacted Muelar report so they could fulfill their oversight/impeachment responsibilities.
Mike Pompeo said, The White House said, Pelosi said. What does the public record say? We are talking about a public document that is required to be filed in a court of public record in order to be a valid subpoena. What people say is irrelevant. What is relevant is the public record. You can not produce it and you refuse to give a reasonable time frame for producing it, and you insist this is a reasonable logic based argument. Unless I can prove the negative of the premise you have the burden of proof of proving, but can not, then clearly you must be right? What?
As for when, nutildah already showed that some can take a year or more to just show up on the internet and even then it's not guaranteed. It's a public record. They have no obligation to stick it on the internet when it can be requested.
And where's your proof that Pompeo said bigfoot is real. Backup it up.
