Re: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son
So expecting you to prove your premise that these subpoenas were real makes me a flat Earther? Is that what we are going with now?
You are overlooking compelling evidence that the subpoena exists in order to continue hammering your one go-to line of "SHOW ME THE SUBPOENA!" This is quite similar to what flat earthers do when they shout "SHOW ME THE EARTH IS ROUND!" while ignoring a large body of evidence suggesting that it is.
The non-existence of the subpoena is independent of Mike Pompeo. How many months do you need to find it? Just give me a number.
I will answer your question: I don't know. It may never appear online.
Now please answer mine: is Mike Pompeo wrong or lying when he mentions receiving a subpoena in his letter to the house committee? If he is not wrong or lying, then what is he talking about when he uses the word "subpoena"?
I am not overlooking any evidence of anything. Some people said there were subpoenas. And? That is not proof it exists or evidence of anything other than some one said it does.
"Some people" said there were subpoenas, including the man who received such a subpoena, Mike Pompeo.
Stop weaseling your way around the question: why would Pompeo lie about receiving a subpoena?
Clearly you think the subpoena doesn't exist. Clearly Mike Pompeo stated it does. How do you reconcile this?