He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.
It does not. Theymos is pretty clear about it:
For contractual violations only, a scammer flag can be created. This is the only thing which causes the "Warning: trade with extreme caution" warning to return. It also triggers a banner similar to the newbie-warning banner which is visible to all users. A scammer flag requires 3 more supporting users than opposing users to become active.
~snip~
Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed.
I've opposed the Flag because I think it's Flag abuse.
Just yesterday, you were on DT2, but you're not anymore, which means you've been excluded by at least 2 DT1 users (
suchmoon and DarkStar_).
You left feedback for retaliatory purposes, which I think is wrong in the first place.
Agreed. I've explained my position on this in
LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.
My advice: withdraw this Flag, Oppose it, and make your arguments against the accusation without the drama.