Re: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son
I already answered your question. The answer is I don't know. It may never be on the internet.
I say the subpoena exists because Mike Pompeo said he received it:
And you squirreled your way out of answering my question yet again. How honest and brave.
I say the subpoena exists because Mike Pompeo said he received it:
And you squirreled your way out of answering my question yet again. How honest and brave.
So you don't have the burden of proof to support your premise because "it may never be on the internet". So of course we must assume they exist for this indefinite amount of time right?
That would be the logical thing to do seeing as how Pompeo said he received the subpoena:
Of course concluding these subpoenas never existed is an irrational response to the inability to produce these subpoenas right? Of course!
Given that Pompeo acknowledged receiving the subpoena, yes, saying it doesn't exist is an irrational response.
Stop ferreting your way around my questions.
I have always answered all your questions. Now simply answer mine: why would Mike Pompeo say he received a subpoena if it didn't exist?