Re: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son
I don't know how you could read this page and the documents linked therein and still say "the subpoena never existed".
https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=711
I especially don't know how you could ignore Giuliani's lawyer's letter to congress saying he had received said subpoena, even if the house had fabricated the existence of the subpoena.
It could only be due either to intellectual dishonesty or lack of intellect.
https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=711
I especially don't know how you could ignore Giuliani's lawyer's letter to congress saying he had received said subpoena, even if the house had fabricated the existence of the subpoena.
It could only be due either to intellectual dishonesty or lack of intellect.
I don't know how you could never have read the subpoena and still insist it exists.
You do know how. You just refuse to admit it, which is a symptom of your perpetual dishonesty.
I thought for a while perhaps the letter itself could act as a congressional subpoena, but the letter from Giuliani's lawyer dispelled all rational doubts that a separate subpoena document exists.
Media (all of it) = wrong
House of Representatives = wrong
Pompeo = wrong
Giuliani = wrong
TECSHARE = right??
What a narcissistic fantasy world you live in.