Re: Criterion for selecting a moderator for the local section
I myself am willing to moderate for free if I were will be given a chance. It's not just about the pay, I'm more concerned about the reputation.
If you are willing to gain reputation of the community by moderating a sub-forum then its totally a bad way of gaining trust from fellow members. Trust and reputation should come eventually on a person and if anyone trying to voluntarily gain them in the name of doing some welfare for the forum I wouldn't trust them forever. To be quite true I have been reporting and meriting 100s of posts in my local board but has never uttered a word about the same and nor I was willing to say that. All I revealed is when someone from my local board PMd me to post in this topic : Let's vote for a new mod for India. Also if someone starts reporting posts as soon as knowing that reports are one of the key factors for appointing a moderator, I wouldn't trust them either even though they have been made a moderator.
This is an utter lie. Let's vote for a new mod for India was posted on August 17, 2019, 04:29:37 PM, while you started claiming of your report on February 21, 2019, 02:06:13 PM.
I don't really post anything on the Indian board but I am a regular visitor to merit few good posts (which I rarely find) and trash the shit present out there. From what I have identified after 9 months of reporting hundreds of posts is that
@Heisenberg_Hunter To achieve your mission to be the moderator and merit source of Indian board, you have lost the track of your lies. Watch your steps buddy.
