Yup, that's all we can do when we don't have conclusive proof of something being true.
Most of your claims are assumptions as well. The only difference is you state you assumptions as if they are facts and I don't.
That's "all" we can do huh? When there is no proof the best course of action is to make baseless assumptions and just believe what people tell you. Sounds like a solid plan.
You didn't state the assumption that there were subpoenas issued from the house relating to impeachment before October 31st, without ever reading them, and then state that as fact? I think you did. Where are those subpoenas Twitchy?
One question Nutilduhhh... what is a "clerk"? Both of these documents are signed by "clerk" What do you think that means Nutilduhhhhhhhhh.
If you had read all the government documents as I had, you would know what it means and know the exceptions as well. But you failed to do that and said you wouldn't when pressed. Here's a hint. It's not the same as what happens in terms of a court of law subpoena as it's a congressional subpoena.
So have you requested the subpoenas you claim don't exist in order to prove your point?
Where's your proof that Pompeo said bigfoot exists?
What do you think Viper1, what does "clerk" mean?