-snip-
@ pada....
anecdotal good experience do NOT mitigate undeniable instances of scamming and trust abuse. You don't get to place in positions of trust undeniable scammers and trust abusers because they were nice to you. That is not how it works.
As far as I know, my trust list is my personal trust/people that I trust, no one cant changes this list except myself and admin.
But I not always left the feedback to the user in my trust lists or support flags that they created. B'cause
I don't have to believe what they have done.
Well no shock owlcatz supports and trusts lauda since they were both implicated in the same extortion.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0Next up panda...
Not sure I get your point, you don't believe the observable and undeniable instances? you do note these are independently verifiable and undeniable right?
Twitchy? what was your point exactly? how does this relate to lauda being on DT?
I think it goes without saying we would not trust any person with observable and undeniable instances of scamming and other undeniably high risk financial behaviors and blatant trust abuse, now found threatening people with flags if they advocate free speech.
Those distrusting us are mainly found on the dirty turds thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.160To be distrusted by scammers and scammer supporters is something one should strive for. That indicates fear and acknowledgement as a clear threat to their status quo.
If one is unable to demonstrate they (scammers and scammer supporters) are observably and undeniably high risk and financially dangerous via the broken systems of control then one must do their uttermost to find a way to warn other members.