from almost 2 months ago , first page of my thread, replying to mr nutildah.(after that follows a long discussion about why backtesting is important)
The only pathetic liars here are you . And you are not even good at it
Also, the success of my business is based on bot's wins. Why no comment on that uh? ever made 75 wins in a row you losers?
Buddy why you can't accept we are legit?
Because you keep lying. You had 4 losing trades, and even if the losses were so small they aren't reflected in your balance, they are still losses. How could you generate a negative Realised PNL without a losing trade?
You don't have any verifiable data that demonstrates your bot is capable of profiting with larger amounts of bitcoin. All you have data on is your 7.615 mBTC deposit, which is less money than the minimum you are asking to participate.
By the way, what is your advertised 495% ROI based on? 2 years of testing data? Testing of what? The exact same bot you have now with no modifications whatsoever? You should probably clarify this when advertising your service because that's part of what makes the whole thing look like a con.
Wrong once again.
I already explained what those negative PNL of 0.0001 mBTC ( 0.001$ loss) several times in the other Threads.
There's a bug in the bitmex websocket's position endpoint. After several days without trades, the position value restores and the endpoint returns error when trying to access it. This causes the bots to crash. What's the solution until bitmex fixes the problem? Make instant 1 contract trades to unlock the endpoint. That 0.001$ loss is the fee paid as taker(necessary to close the "unlock trade" in less than 1 second) and the mathematical loss that come from the 0.5$ of spread between the ask and the bid.
I have all kind of verifiable data, if you are unable to access a bitmex account via terminal is not my problem, but i will make an easy step by step guide when i will have some free time.
You still don't understand what a Market Maker is , and why they REQUIRE HUGE AMOUNT OF CAPITALS. Please DYOR before making a fool of yourself over and over again.
The 495% roi in 20 months is backtest, the exact same code that is running right now with 100% win rate. Before attacking the validity of backtest, please learn what they are and why they are mandatory for every legit bot.
Thanks
This is unnecessary assholery which is also based on an incorrect assumption. It also has nothing to do with the fact that you are lying in order to make your project appear more successful than it actually is.
Such a market expert, from the guy that doesn't even know the difference between maker and taker orders. From the guy that says 75 wins in a row and 100% rate is just 20$ profit. Please go and explain why slippage is a problem for market makers and why Arakne couldn't manage 800 btc properly then.
The only pathetic liars here are you . And you are not even good at it
Also, the success of my business is based on bot's wins. Why no comment on that uh? ever made 75 wins in a row you losers?
It would appear that the majority ALL of your trades were positive, so that is commendable.
Buddy why you can't accept we are legit?
Because you keep lying. You had 4 losing trades, and even if the losses were so small they aren't reflected in your balance, they are still losses. How could you generate a negative Realised PNL without a losing trade?
You don't have any verifiable data that demonstrates your bot is capable of profiting with larger amounts of bitcoin. All you have data on is your 7.615 mBTC deposit, which is less money than the minimum you are asking to participate.
By the way, what is your advertised 495% ROI based on? 2 years of testing data? Testing of what? The exact same bot you have now with no modifications whatsoever? You should probably clarify this when advertising your service because that's part of what makes the whole thing look like a con.
Quote
You had 4 losing trades
Wrong once again.
I already explained what those negative PNL of 0.0001 mBTC ( 0.001$ loss) several times in the other Threads.
There's a bug in the bitmex websocket's position endpoint. After several days without trades, the position value restores and the endpoint returns error when trying to access it. This causes the bots to crash. What's the solution until bitmex fixes the problem? Make instant 1 contract trades to unlock the endpoint. That 0.001$ loss is the fee paid as taker(necessary to close the "unlock trade" in less than 1 second) and the mathematical loss that come from the 0.5$ of spread between the ask and the bid.
I have all kind of verifiable data, if you are unable to access a bitmex account via terminal is not my problem, but i will make an easy step by step guide when i will have some free time.
You still don't understand what a Market Maker is , and why they REQUIRE HUGE AMOUNT OF CAPITALS. Please DYOR before making a fool of yourself over and over again.
The 495% roi in 20 months is backtest, the exact same code that is running right now with 100% win rate. Before attacking the validity of backtest, please learn what they are and why they are mandatory for every legit bot.
Thanks
This is unnecessary assholery which is also based on an incorrect assumption. It also has nothing to do with the fact that you are lying in order to make your project appear more successful than it actually is.
Such a market expert, from the guy that doesn't even know the difference between maker and taker orders. From the guy that says 75 wins in a row and 100% rate is just 20$ profit. Please go and explain why slippage is a problem for market makers and why Arakne couldn't manage 800 btc properly then.