Are you tagging account sellers too?
chronicsky was selling accounts here: aNtiClocK
was keen to buy...
In this
ponzi thread (started and being promoted by irfan_pak10) in
post 39 irfan_pak10 wants to buy LPCBTC 's account therefore it is possible LPCBTC was sold to irfan_pak10. aNtiClocK posts in this ponzi thread started by irfan_pak10 saying they have joined. Notice how aNtiClocK is
mentioned *before* posting?
irfan_pak10 also sells accounts in this thread: [
Archive]
*edit*
Have just recalled that user
nutildah offered their
own account for sale a while ago as recently as the 23rd of July, 2017.
BPIP is inconclusive as the change of password ten times in 77 days didn't occur until 2018.
Since anything AFTER the sale would be impossible to prove. Pass changes, btc addresses , posts saying " didn't sell it really" etc etc .... the only sure thing you have is the account sales pitch.
If we are tagging account sellers. The sales pitch would be the most important piece of evidence there is.
When you also realize nutildah was screaming account sales = scam facilitating before deciding to sell their own this is an especially damning insight into their character. Certainly looks to be a case for flagging and tagging more than any other account seller who may not be sure they are facilitating scams.
It seems you have dug too deeply timelord, you will now start to see the scammers and abusers/gamers of these current systems of control will come after you. Lauda first then if you keep digging more red and flags will follow. Consider carefully because theymos is not going to come to your aid for uncovering their scamming/gaming/abusing and getting punished by them using his systems of control.
I say keep digging, but of course it is up to you.