http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html#SECTION_G001I've linked and see that you reproduce his logic errors.
Still waiting to see why you think you are entitled to the protection of the state but that you feel that you should not have to pay for it.
While I'm sure there are very few documents in recorded history that reproduce logic in perfection, I'm sure your philosophies are much worse, have more holes and less logic than his. I prefer to take a less dangerous, less logical and less government route.
In answer to your entitlement question regarding the protection of the state. I never asked for the protection of the state. I don't want the protection of the state. If I were to accept their assistance, I would probably be "on the hook" for it. I'm not. I don't have a problem with finding my own security. The state doesn't want to give me a choice, so they tax me. It's forced "entitlement" - not nice.
Sorry you can't get away with that sophistry. You say that the protection is needed but that you should not have to pay because you don't "want" it. If its needed, "want" doesn't arise.