Re: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son
No, that's not reasonable given the fact that the people who received said subpoenas have acknowledged their existence. They aren't Democrats, they aren't liberal media, they aren't me or TwitchySeal. They are extremely loyal employees of the president. And here you are, fighting their words because they aren't in line with your incorrect belief that the subpoenas don't exist.
We already told you 20 times: we can't produce the subpoenas because they are not online.
https://www.justsecurity.org/67076/public-document-clearinghouse-ukraine-impeachment-inquiry/
There is a copy of the subpoena for DoD employee Laura Cooper, probably because she agreed to it and gave testimony already:
https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ukraine-clearinghouse-2019.10.23.Cooper-subpoena.pdf
Jon Sale, counsel for Giuliani, knows this subject far better than you or any of us, and in his response to congress he acknowledges Giuliani's receipt of a subpoena:
He's not making half-assed arguments about "due process" or questioning the fact that the subpoena exists. And his word trumps yours on this issue every day of the week.
We already told you 20 times: we can't produce the subpoenas because they are not online.
https://www.justsecurity.org/67076/public-document-clearinghouse-ukraine-impeachment-inquiry/
There is a copy of the subpoena for DoD employee Laura Cooper, probably because she agreed to it and gave testimony already:
https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ukraine-clearinghouse-2019.10.23.Cooper-subpoena.pdf
Jon Sale, counsel for Giuliani, knows this subject far better than you or any of us, and in his response to congress he acknowledges Giuliani's receipt of a subpoena:
He's not making half-assed arguments about "due process" or questioning the fact that the subpoena exists. And his word trumps yours on this issue every day of the week.
People make assumptions. People are mistaken. People lie. The fact that a small number, or a large number of people think or say something does not constitute evidence of anything other than thoughts and ideas. I am not fighting anything. I am calling out the fact that you have the burden of proof of proving these subpoenas even existed, and you can not meet this burden of proof. People talking and thinking things is not meeting your burden of proof.
It's not just "a large number of people" who disagree with you, its everyone. You are saying everyone is wrong on the subject except for you, including the people who received the subpoenas and their lawyers.
You know nothing about constitutional law, yet here you are saying you know better than the lawyers practicing it. You are an arrogant fool.